The Demonology of worlds and the Empire of the Possible.
1)It almost goes without saying that everyone lives there own supercharges and ultra significant world. A world where one passion takes the from off one drug, which is guaranteed to seize control of the lives and the minds they build, and create them a world.
2)My world with its charged passions is therefore only slightly related to yours.
3)The ingredients might be the same but the very fact that I apply those ingredients to my case is enough o open out the difference.
4)World are vectors, they move off in spinning manners, and we the inhabitancy of these vectors.
5)I am therefore Jenny Wren making dolls and scalding her ‘child’ (father0tmake an impossible difficult life feel funny, and feel worth while.
6)I am Mr Dolls crossing or not crossing the street, locked in his world of opportunities lost and imagined drunken fears.
7) Or darker yet I am the school master whose world has collapsed or rather been turned inside out. Its only sense therefore no lies in stalking and individual he loathes in the name of a spurned love.
8)Each world is silent- caught in its own traps, something assumed
9). I assume that you have your own world far more truly than I assume you have your own self or individuality.
10) An individuality essential mans a right to a world – a habitat that I see and respect.
11)I look into your eyes and assume hat a world is reflected there. This world is a world that then demands I allow for it – however improbable and complex it is.
12) Other peoples world their respect and the conflict that merge because these others will always over flow also ours, are of course the great story of a life. Thy are what makes our life our own.
13)In the kingdom of world the fact that the perceptions that infuses all worlds will be in effect a problem.
14)Each passion claims a world for its own, and yet is then betrayed in the claim. The elements it wants to hold are elements which are in effect pooled and held in many minds and across myriad intervals of thinking.
15)My elements bleed away from me and also become your.
16)Of course selfish acts of memory might assert this world IS mine it must be mine. But Like
17)Mr Dolls crossing the road or Jenny Wren attempting to manage her own existence, one ahs one control here.
18)The very ability that allowed us to over flow these perception with passion, will then open us to whatever other journeys these perceptions might that us.
19) We might then be caught in pointless journeys to Clerkenwell or Bethnal Green – journeys we know are ludicrous and yet which we cannot help taking. Our passions cannot control the very public perceptions they wish to claim for their own, and are scillitated I that failure.
20)That is the cannot hold the world down.
21)In our my inner temple we are therefore (as Deleuze notes) blown open or at least open a chink.
22)We cannot close the loop of passion, and cannot therefore hold any passion down.
23)Or the only way is to retreat as far as we dare down the road of inner warping , and feed off affects there. That is it is possible to use passion to pretend that whatever happens falls within the dominant myth of our lives, and yet then the truth creeps in reflected in others lives.
24) Jenny Wren can therefore keep the myth that she is he mother going. She can pretend her drunken sponging father is her son (he behaves like it) and she a worried parent. And can in that worry for another feel a worry for herself (this is a shared affect) The fantasy then allows her to cope with nothing that happens, as others are dragged into that fantasy element. And yet it breaks at to point.
25)In another’s presence the refection of incredulity in their ways shows her folly., and teas creep put of her eyes. Here childhood therefore break though, an the crippled child dealt the impossible lot shows through.
26)Even more problematically her world is only possible because in fantasy she in the mother of her father. He is forced then the go along with this passion, and have his life made by it. This does into mean he accepts it or forms an exchange of affect with it.
27)He does not. He silently resent it, and looks for ways to undermine in low way here fantasy, and with it her little liveable life.
28)I build my life one the bone of your oppression. Bones that are never of and never simply there.
29)Each of us therefore is caught in the prism of a world. over the cause of a live we will change and shift, the world we live in the minds we hold done will then likewise change and shift. But whatever falls, we, as we call ourselves a thing, need those worlds.
30)And yet as world come and go with experience, that is with the dance beyond ourselves that passion is led on y perception, it is cellar that as we claim world we are caught up in the weave of the possible.
31)In this world I am this, becomes the watch word, but if the perception move around a little or a lot then what I am and what world I live in will shift.
32) World therefore imply domains of possible where those worlds meet. We meet in our sealed ways, We take something from each other. An yet what we are taken is never necessarily what the other is giving,
33)What we are taking is therefore is therefore our own set of possible. We at of what we take, These actions then effect or bounce into the other part of this exchange- altering what they are in varying asymmetric ways – driving them this or that way – making them other.
34)In making them other we too are of course changed, and so round and round we go.
35)To meet you in my world and to look at you in yours, is therefore to open a bridge of possible between us. Our world might meet in numerous different ways. They possibly are. We might be friends this time and build the friendship into our minds.
36)Or we might fight given the current stat of our passions and ten have to live in the knowledge of that fight.
37)We meet therefore as a beyond that falls it not he orbit of another’s world. The neat little pools that world is. And in falling we offer other ways that pool might manifest itself, other places it will as it is alive move of towards – other possible. We invite in meeting the other to re-throw itself.
38)This exchange is therefore everywhere, I haunts the beneficial exchanges and the bad. Everywhere as world collide possible open out – different way each world might change- different types of changing.
39)To meet another is to allow other world
40)Fair means or foul – good or bad the possible spawn.
41)The possible has though three clearly pointers of is own.
42)Firstly is operates in necessary fantasy. The possible is not the simply there it is not real (and not overly virtual). It is rather what is pun into reality. It operates by echoing reality into a fantasy.
43)Elements that then straddle many worlds are taken up and render real as a fantasy name. The domain of the possible is therefore the domain that invents the impossible that fall between worlds. That is the elements that are not simply there, and not simply real.
44)They are the elements that are able to resonate across myriad worlds. To call Riad Mr Aaron is not a simply act, but rather one that resonates across the many action of Riah and his many effects upon many worlds. The names the possible express are then the names that link an individual as an event in many lives, and relate to and jangle across how one person enters into and transforms many different worlds. Riad is a once a ‘falls; money lender in one fantasy world, but also the patriarch capable of acing to protect Lizzy, also God mother to Jenny Wren, also a seller of material also a…
45)All are then hooked not in the name Riah which is related o the world the individual Riad builds but rather Mr Aaron, the insult that jangles across many peoples attitude to the man.
46)He is n individual but also a cipher which opens up others world, and the kingdom of possible is necessarily to invent the language to express this change.
47)Secondly the possible’s power lies in is ability to open out communication between world. It imposes its own unity upon these worlds, in this opening out. It forces them into union.
48) And yet this shot gun marriage, it feels that something is always missing. The Possible misses any rhyme or reason in what it does, Or o put it simply it is the denial of rhyme or reason.
49)It is merely the possible. And yet I imposing these connections it is asset holds many options open aware that there are other games at sake here, other ways to link or loop these worlds.
50)This other is of course the affect. The Affect is the one element capable of making sense of these possible, and making their order the explosion actually matter or at least impose or open out loops or links within it. The possible is therefore essential the ‘raw’ form of the affect.
51)it That is it is the affect process carried out randomly and as the individual sees it.
52)The process without rhyme or reason or centre.
53)The process then as those who would deny the power of the affect would have it.
54)The process itself feels this lack. That is it feels it exists on sufferance. It is the creation of the individuality wallahs who would rather have individuality and random possibly that open to the idea that the worlds they drawdown into itself are not what they seem. That is hat these worlds are merely adjunctive in the affect that spins between them.
55)The possible is therefore in a sense merely a kingdom in the affect. It is that kingdom created when the element that are affectively linked deny that link, and want to hold on to their own world.
56)The possible is therefore an element in a necessarily missing kingdom- the ambassador of the affect of the quested after it. Only the affect with straddles possible and waits beyond them makes it make sense. Only the affect breaks it from the charm of myriad worlds,.
57) The possible of course heave no agenda (only God can give them one) but they have a point where the are absorbed into another reality- a point they meet the affect at.
58)That is the possible are in others the kingdom of posies –open ended and problematic, and yet as they are absorbed within the affect are always a part of another story, and a possibly richer on.
59)It is we without little worlds that then deprive the possible of every power than breaking us. We see them as they are to us, and into necessarily as they might be elsewhere in other hoops of being.
60)Thirdly the passion hats the possible even as it conjures it up.
61)Ho could it not?
62)The passionate man always wants to lay claim to throne world thank you very very much.
63)It wants it, it craves it, It must have it for its own.
64)This world, this owned world here.
65)It then looks to the possible wither or loathing or suspicion.
66)It creates the possible as the point it might be broken at, The point it is alarmed raging against the point it must as it is riveted down, it must follow monitor and break.
67)The possible is therefore scouted out, and stalked by passions.
68)It is the element they control.
69)The element they have to allow and yet only as they can then ensure that other elements do not come it.
70)The possible are therefore always the product of an enemy.
71)They cannot shale of this hatred- all they can do as they are possible it tease it.
72)That is their power lies in leading it a merry dance between worlds. A process that ensures only more hatred.
73)It the problem of the possible that they are created by forces that loath them.
74)It is no coincidence that they are thought of as devils – as elements beyond he world that tumble within it.
75)Elements that can therefore only be hooped into thought as something beyond the worlds.
76)They are so caught in a paradox. On the one hand as they are between they are the help meet of the affect, the kingdom of this between.
77) And yet they are not poised this way. As they are possible they fall on separate worlds and are conditioned by them. they are therefore the products of passions gaze.
78)It is therefore the problem of the possible how to reconcile these two conflicting element.
79) In the former they lack power, and are merely an adjunctive in the processes that run between elements of the universe.
80)In the other they have all the power and yet only as a thing despised and a thing alienated.
81)The possible therefore open on their own possibility – which to be/ Devil or servant?