The Constellations of Fog
Problem 1: Fog poses a problem In town and country alike – the problem of slitting. A Fog is that which hides endless diffusing what is there. Light is spread across the universe. Light becomes unfocused and unfocusing. The fog becomes as king. And yet Fog is not quit the same in the inner world of a self an he outer of the wider country. In the wider country a fog blurs, and distorts and yet des not threaten and choke. It is in me that the fog becomes coking – I becomes destructive and displaceable. And yet in the problem in that hiding many secrets lie. And yet in either sphere simply stops a mind controlling itself. I stops it being able to claim the world as its own. The world slips into what the fog allow or reveals.
Partial solution1; and yet this does not mean that the fog loses all negation. One is lost. On the country the fog posses the problem of who can walk feely within it. What is able to hold what it is in the world of thing and without- the landscape of diffusion? The answer is relatively simple –the figure of the law: The law is a system within the world and yet within me. It is the point that I follow world or am followed by it. The point then that my ability to create a setup of rules and to follow this rules are given in the single throw. And yet this giving itself poses the problem. Is this onanism? Am I simply following that which I am?
Problem 2: But this then poses a problem – where is the law. Who can own it in any sense or have it make meaning. If I it me or you? This is a complex problem because in a sense as caught up with flouting or enaction. That is I perceived the law operating when another either strains against the maxims it holds so is simply bound by them. the law is therefore actually something in a third party to understand a credence to a rule. It is what is imposes in the third voice. This imposition gives the third party power. that is in observing the law an racing others to observe that law they understand how to control the patterns of the world. Law becomes then external to anyone, but always of the third conscious party, which issues it.
Partial solution. The third parties power there lies in abstracting a law from a reality. N yet once abstracted by its nature the law applied not to anyone circumstance or series of event. It becomes rather a complex to bind others within- a pole set within the mind of the third party.. As it is set in the third party the rules and the mind of third party become utterly entrapped in each other. They become the same series or rules. That is the point that the third party is using or misusing the lord, and using law to so. The third-party therefore takes up the law to ride rough shoed over individuals and their ways. It uses the name of another or the rules their inexorable rules of the world to ride as rough shod over that world. To Own as the third part rules is therefore to use those rules to enact ones own will and do so as if that rules was a rule in the world. The powers of nature and the powers of man become one and the same series of powering ups.
Problem three. But then who des one practise this powering up of – but the bullies of the world. People will therefore tumble into the third parties world. people ‘one’ is caught up with in one way or another, people who the third party has business of various different kinds with, and as a they tumble in they expose themselves. The rules of the world become therefore in the hands of a third party the cane to beat the fourth part with. Or more particularly they becomes as something petty and puerile. The power of nature suspended into a sequence of petty laws and problematic arguments. The problem of man is therefore that it uses the laws of nature to invest the most petty of squabbles. They become the stuff o house disputes.
Partial solution four: The issue of course is why the rules here are simple. To use the powers of nature in hue disputes is to change the rules f another world, the social one. All the steady social practise that put the power into the hands of the articulate and the passionate is lost at the end of the gun. The medicine man gives way to the scientist or money lender. It is they that wield the big commercial stick. The rules that had run one way suddenly become reversed. Inside and out become complex. The passionate fourth party thought they were the master, they were the one that dragged a world into their own parlour and spider like sucked it dry. And yet at the same time that other world, is not so very easily beaten. It does not die just like that. But rather it fights back. Or rather it suddenly shifts it pointer of emphasis. It is where the man with the big stick did not expect it to be. it is otherwise and they are caught it that challenge. The world and the law that holds that world operates therefore involving sideways. It is the moving as sideways. It is the power of being as a sideways. The power to warp onto another’s mind from a place they did not know – from the domain of their current cogent thoughts. Once one is within there minds one can destroy. The fourth party suddenly finds they are the victim- caught by the memories they have to dance the third parties laws tune.
Problem five. But what of the law itself? How does that work? Or rather how does one enquire of it the extra secrets it hides. There’s no point running against the law full stop if one is the third party. Once should never attempt the put and out assault. Rather one finds out what affects the law hides within ties holds, that is what point humanity is necessarily productively caught by the law, indirectly. One moves therefore very cautiously to find out how the law acted when and were. That is how it managed to hide within its fold the power of the affect. The la itself will onto of course reveal where the power is- but will not hide the fact that it somewhere contains it. What lose is a law but the ability to switch around thoughts, the ability to contain or hid that which aches us all, and renders everyone different. This othering, this switch the third party of course feeds one, envies and yet cannot directly understand.
Partial solution five: the problem then becomes how does one as a third party tip toe up to what the law hides and make its secret ones own thought? How does one reach into the law and make it ones own rules? Here the system is complex, ad yet strangely gentle. One reaches at the law by getting the law itself to speech. By treating if as it were an individual for a while. In an experiment one invites it to reveal something to itself. One makes it at home. One does not rule out to try to immediately dominate or destroy .One rather makes the law chat. One invents was to allow the outside to communicate to the inside. Ruses in which it can be: ways for it to manifest itself- ways that in there giving reveal ones own power. One therefore feels oneself as a power in allowing the law to speak it nature and say what it might e – or how it has allowed the world to be in a certain way. The rules therefore become themselves trapped in the desires of the rid party, or tricked to give up their secrets – a giving that conforms the third party their own power…
To be fogged becomes then the power the third party wields against the world. the fate, as using a law to bind other up, and confusing that law with the world, it triumphs – it enforces a will as if it were a law of nature. To be a third party is therefore to confuse will land nature and to force others to do so.